Re: Propose pyorbit for 2.13/2.14?

On 11/14/05, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <gjc inescporto pt> wrote:
>   OK, here's my personal opinion, from the point of view of probably the
> only person that's likely to be willing to maintain pyorbit (please
> correct me if I'm wrong).
>   I think it's a good idea to propose it, as long as it doesn't mean I
> have to do real development just because it's included. :P  Honestly,
> given the lack of interest of the GNOME project in ORBit2, I don't think
> it's profitable for the project that I invest much time with
> development.  I can promise to review patches in bugzilla, maybe fix
> simple bus, and push out releases, but that's it.  Anyway, I think
> pyorbit is great, and it's stable, so not much development is needed
> anyway.

I think that'd be a perfect way to handle it.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]