Re: Gtk.AccelGroup connect and disconnec signals

[infirit <infirit gmail com>]

Op 04/30/2017 om 09:04 AM schreef Christoph Reiter:
> > The question is, should the same now be done for PyGObject?
> I don't think we can without breaking existing code.

Very likely we will be breaking code. But if we are going to break 
existing code we could also ask for a API change in Gtk itself? Reading 
the guidelines on [1] asking for a API changes for language bindings it 
is a valid reason. The question then is what to name it because 
gtk_accel_group_connect_group will be confusing in C.

Shall I at least open a bug report on this?

~infirit

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject/OverrideGuidelines