Re: moving some stuff from pygobject to pygtk



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:13, John Stowers
<john stowers lists gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> I know that pygtk doesn't have an excess of maintainers right now, but
>> these modules should be relatively mature already.
>
> Agree. I was one of the first large-scale users of the GIO bindings, and
> they took at least 2 cycles to get to a stable state.
>
> Finally, I would be saddened if the port to Python3 destabilised
> PyGObject very much. PyGObject is stable software, and backward
> compatibility breakages should be unacceptable (but deprecations
> welcomed).

No backward compatibility breakages are planned, I was referring to
introducing bugs that the test cases don't cover.

Regards,

Tomeu

>> There's also the question of what to do with the Gtk and Gdk overrides
>> in http://git.gnome.org/browse/pygobject/tree/gi/overrides and their
>> tests, which don't really belong to pygobject.
>
> I can't comment on this one sorry.
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tomeu
>> _______________________________________________
>> python-hackers-list mailing list
>> python-hackers-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-hackers-list mailing list
> python-hackers-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]