Re: [Planner] Are fixed duration tasks really fixed?

[Xavier Ordoquy <xordoquy wanadoo fr>]

On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 08:08, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The duration field seems to take into account working hours. I think it
> would be more natural if duration was really the amount of calendar time
> required to complete the task regardless of working hours. For example
> if I mark the task to have a fixed duration of 6 days, then I expect it
> to be 6 days long and not 8 if the weekend has non-working days. Or to
> take the example from the manual: The gestation period for a human baby
> is nine months. It cannot be delayed by adding non-working days or
> hours.

Hopyfully baby gestation doesn't have non working days.
If a task needs 6 working days, it'll be a full week and a day. That's
the behaviour I would expect. I'm really missing your point here.

Regards,
Xavier Ordoquy.