Re: [Planner Dev] One step behind, two steps ahead.

[Kurt Maute <kurt maute us>]

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 07:37 +0200, Matteo Nastasi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:49:50PM -0400, Kurt Maute wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 10:07 +0200, Matteo Nastasi wrote:
> > > One step behind:
> > >   1) to develope the previously described features in an acceptable time,
> > >      at least for the first devel iteration, we must inactivate all kinds
> > >      of task's dependencies that imply retroactions (Kurt, don't hates
> > >      me ;), because the interaction between retroactions and 
> > >      full_priority_scheduling enhances algorithms complexity very much.
> > 
> > Could you clarify what you mean by retroactions?  You mean maybe tasks
> > that calculate start date from the end date like FF & SF?
> Yes, the worst example is a snake chain of tasks like FS, FF, FS, FF ...
>  with overlapping resources ;); leveling this configuration isn't
>  simple.

Perhaps you could just make the leveling ignore tasks with those types
of dependencies for now?

-- 
Kurt Maute <kurt maute us>