On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 23:47 +0200, Richard Hult wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm usually not to keen on adding this kind of distro-specific patches > to CVS, since they are usually better kept in the ports/portage/debian > package/rpm spec files/etc. So I would prefer not to commit this. Understandable... I just didn't really think it was _that_ distro specific. While I did solve the problem specifically for gentoo, there's always the possibility that others may want to compile in a similar type sandbox... like I said, the only real changes were to the configure script to allow a difference between the installation directory for the plugins and their real destination. It really just makes things more flexible for _any_ packaging system, so I think it would be better in the actual configuration script rather than everybody being forced to work around it on their own. And everything defaults to the current behavior, so anyone not using these options would be completely unaffected. But it's not that important, so if I failed to convince you, then that's the end of it:) -- Gregory Symons Software Engineer GPG Public Key available at http://www.gsconsulting.biz/PGP/gsymons.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part