Hi! El mié, 19-05-2004 a las 23:57, Malcolm Tredinnick escribió: > On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 19:13 +0200, Xavier Ordoquy wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 18:57, Richard Hult wrote: > > > I'd say that this is a much better approach (to use python). Even though > > > I don't really like the idea of parsing html at all ;) > > > > I don't either but unless I write some xml-rpc like scripts and they get > > released in bugzilla and poeple update their installed bugzilla (makes a > > lot of if-like) I don't see any better solution. > > Don't know if it's worth to give it a try. > > OK, what functionality is the bugzilla plugin going to provide? I sort > of read the code, but I am not confident that I understand all the > features you are trying to add. > > My reason for asking is that recent bugzillas (2.16.x and the eventual > 2.18 releases) include the ability to get the bug *output* in XML > format, so it is easy to parse with a program. Input is an entirely > different story and does require fiddling with a fairly experimental CGI > script on the bugzilla installation machine. > In the past plugin that Roberto and me developed to import bugzilla data into Planner, we use the XML interface. http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/mrproject/src/plugins/bugzilla-plugin/ you can see the details in http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/mrproject/src/plugins/bugzilla-plugin/mg-project-bugzilla-plugin.c?rev=1.2&view=auto Cheers -- Alvaro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente