Re: [Planner Dev] First calendar undo patch
- From: Alvaro del Castillo <acs lambdaux com>
- To: Richard Hult <richard imendio com>
- Cc: Planner Dev <planner-dev lists imendio com>
- Subject: Re: [Planner Dev] First calendar undo patch
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:36:04 +0000
El jue, 17-06-2004 a las 13:06, Richard Hult escribió:
> On tor, 2004-06-17 at 07:37 +0000, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> > Hi!
> > El mié, 16-06-2004 a las 08:20, Richard Hult escribió:
> > > On tis, 2004-06-15 at 05:16 +0000, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> > > > Hi guys!
> > > >
> > > > Here goes the fresh new patch for the calendar editor, this one for the
> > > > calendar day type editor.
> > >
> > > Looks good as usual :)
> > >
> > > It's probably a good idea to start with creation and deletion of
> > > calendars though since I'm afraid that it might end up like for tasks
> > > otherwise, that we need to redo the work (remember the ID stuff we
> > > almost did? :)
> > >
> > Hmmm, I am not sure I am following you, maybe because I haven't looked
> > to creation and deletion of calendars.
> Say for example that we remove a calendar, and keep a reference to it in
> a command in a way that doesn't work when the calendar is inserted again
> with a redo operation. Things like this that bit us when we first did
> the task undo stuff. I'm not sure that we will have any problems but I
> think it's a good idea to start in that area this time around to be
Hmm, we haven't used ids in all the undo code and it works now
correctly. I think calendar shouldn't be different in this way and if we
finally do all the object_id stuff, we will need to do it in all the
undo code. Actually, I will try to follow the same way we have used
> > > What do you think?
> > I will start trying to do it to find the problems :)
> > About the ID stuff, it seems we will need it for the datase
> > identification of componentes and access control to objetcs from
> > different people and version control, but we will see ;-)
> Sure, but we still don't want to redo all the undo code :)
Yes, but I am not sure that we have the same needs in versioning in
objects for concurrency and undo code.
Alvaro del Castillo San Félix
Lambdaux Software Services S.R.L.
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Centro de Apoyo Tecnológico
C/ Tulipán sn 28933 Mostoles, Madrid-Spain
acs lambdaux com
] [Thread Prev