Re: [Planner Dev] lag & more

[Richard Hult <richard imendio com>]

On ons, 2004-07-28 at 19:46 -0400, Kurt Maute wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 12:50, lincoln phipps openmutual net wrote:
> > Andrej Vodopivec wrote:
> > > The single thing that stands out is predecessor lag time.
> > > User guide says:
> > > "Finally, you can enter a lag time for the relationship, which 
> > > represents the
> > > number of days after the relationship has been satisfied."
> > 
> > Thats not right ! and its actually hours and not days; when you add
> > a link and set the lag then the value you add into the dialog is
> > actually an hourly figure, though its stored in the memory/xml
> > as a usual planner time i.e. in  seconds (1 in the dialog stored as 3600)
> 
> Interesting.  I'm not sure how that one got by me, considering that I
> remember discussing the issue of lag time being in hours more than once
> on this list in the past.  
> 
> I'll update the user guide.

Hm, it's probably better to fix the code for the next release.

/Richard

-- 
Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/