Re: signed summary file

[Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivano gnu org>]

Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com> writes:

> On 05/04/2015 10:27 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> > I am working on having static-delta files listed into the summary, in
> > this way it will be possible to sign only the summary file instead of
> > each file separately:
> >
> > https://github.com/GNOME/ostree/pull/98
> >
> > As part of the review process, we got into the question whetever it is
> > better to have a separate summary.sig file, as my series does, or
> > instead include signatures in the summary file itself and by possibly
> > breaking backward compatibility.
>
>
> I wanted to review the comments there but can't find them now.
>
> Did you perhaps force-push a rebase?  If so, can you scrounge up links
> to the relevant comments?

yes sorry, I had to push a commit separately from the series, I am not
sure what would be the "github way" of doing it, revert&fixup?

I have added a bunch of fixup! commits and I didn't touch any previous
one (except one commit message), so the commits to review starts from:

e345456d08f84a45b72a62caec96c22e5c0d35c7

Thanks,
Giuseppe