Re: [orca-list] More flat review rewrite goodness: giant-table issues fixed

[kendell clark <coffeekingms gmail com>]

hi
 Or not, I spoke too soon. I tested with the network applet, and flat
review still reads the "connected" label even though I disconnected as a
test. So this doesn't look like an orca bug. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks
Kendell Clark


kendell clark wrote:
> hi
> This seems to work fantastic hear. I've been testing in seamonkey. I
> don't have an inbox with 40000 messages but I do have several hundred at
> a time and orca's flat review is much better than it was. Hard to argue
> with improvement!
> Thanks
> Kendell Clark
>
>
> Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> > Hey all.
> >
> > You should know the refrain by now ("I've still got a long way to go,
> > but....") <smiles>
> >
> > I've just merged in some changes which should make invoking flat review
> > in tables much more efficient. Especially in giant tables. My test case
> > was a Thunderbird folder with over 40,000 messages. Before Orca would
> > not respond for a really long time; now it responds in 2 seconds. And
> > I've got other not-yet-merged changes that will make it faster than
> > that. But I hope you'll agree that going from an uber-long time to 2
> > seconds was worth committing in the meantime.
> >
> > To finish the familiar tune on a familiar note: Please pull master, let
> > me know what you think, and especially if I've broken something.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > --joanie
> > _______________________________________________
> > orca-list mailing list
> > orca-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> > Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> > Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> > GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> > Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org