Re: [orca-list] Proposed patch for progress beeps



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,
I think it's better if not reducing volume as pitch increases - it
becomes too quiet. Is there a particular reason for that? It sounds
good to me without it.
Also, I think the frequency of announcing updates in Orca settings is
better to be 0 for beeps, i.e. no delay between announcements.
I find a duration of 0.075 seconds and one second for beeps a little
bit high. Just tried 0.05 and 0.5 and it looks good to me.
Is there some way to make sure the final beep is not skipped? Cause
now it could happen - if the progress is too fast.

BTW, what about the Sound Icons? I hope their not forgotten.

Best wishes,
Zahari

On 02/17/2016 10:03 PM, chrys87 wrote:
Howdy,

here you can generate a progressbar.

Am 17.02.2016 um 20:41 schrieb José Vilmar Estácio de Souza:
Hi all,, a dumb question: Which programs can I use to test the 
progress bar? Thanks and sorry for the dumb question!

On 02/17/2016 05:20 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
Hey Nolan, all.

Could you please attach the patch to 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758328? Ditto for 
anyone else interested in tweaking the progress bar beeps. If 
you all can reach consensus, I'm happy to commit the 
agreed-upon experience.

Thanks! --joanie

On 02/17/2016 01:20 PM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
Hey,

So I had some of the same issues with progress bar beeps
that I did with NVDA. As an experiment, I whipped up this
patch.

Basically, according to my non-coffee-fueled back-of-napkin 
calculations, the current implementation starts progress bar 
beeps at a few hundred Hz and scales them up to something 
like 2100. I don't objectively know what 2.1 KHz sounds
like, but I do have some objective notion of what an octave
sounds like, and just as a sighted person doesn't have to
think about how far along a progress bar is, I think we
should have the same convenience.

This patch starts progress bar beeps at middle C and ramps 
the progression up an octave linearly. I initially had a 
logarithmic implementation but found it more confusing than
I thought. Perceptually the progress bar appeared to move 
quickly then slow down, which is consistent with the
numbers. I haven't tested this out with faster progress bars
yet so there may be some benefit to logarithmic, but one
thing at a time.

We may also be able to drop the volume-scaling code if we're 
not ramping the frequencies up above 1 KHz, but I haven't 
tested that yet.

Thoughts?


_______________________________________________ orca-list 
mailing list orca-list gnome org 
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list Orca wiki: 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca Orca documentation: 
https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/ GNOME Universal 
Access guide: 
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html Log 
bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org

_______________________________________________ orca-list 
mailing list orca-list gnome org 
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list Orca wiki: 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca Orca documentation: 
https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/ GNOME Universal 
Access guide: 
https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html Log 
bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org




_______________________________________________ orca-list mailing 
list orca-list gnome org 
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list Orca wiki: 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca Orca documentation: 
https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/ GNOME Universal Access 
guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWxOZuAAoJELcU47hAtAnqSEQQAJ2L/zXrLL92aRSkpfx1mA5C
26SUuqJjlrXZQz6+cfyozOZv9uRy2sxplbrQWkSm4Z8gTruQF6K8Cawl9lbbn/se
MLerpL5mzv8TopfYBfhq9srhLyxvU+wbdNsKJhYPQcVLgZzOMVLYTDokRIQn2N6a
h96sxxLhyoMaBDbsRrV+3+4fixcX3QDK36cRimin1VPzAS0ONzMKtzn+lWaWvX7b
fA6HZFamhm/giFcaEwEHxMsisOiyagJRoInc/CRdWKK3b9KnIQUXhpuEJPxL+bW5
KbMP0LU3zp59EjiTYM/vz4GBj+skKvYjpRFLztkj74NvVEIfCMLf4by2qE9fTYiP
rqld+sZsaWopgwVHJyxIhU254TM2dOqhsBXw9PG2t2TypEMk8iKH7b1G94GCXVCy
ZjJ9xoC4dDBx0NX9eaQVx7HU4qcKVfkSCjlHfBovLbYAlpGMRNjzJf/BsKIfatUH
m1WOIV3FIm4yLkW1/Bg5VYnAcirWZbBLkTaUfbj60jVzjbNp2ZOp5Zx0pNP6JU9F
EeZOf4LK1jbJnTmrK8LcsbKVWgjjxr4NUo2IuCWqlUGLxKNhkm+EMIiS5N9nSnG5
dlsiOqFOA0hShQZ1r+6bb1mtMcjao3iJ+QRXIy6XR73ESPCzUR8d5EZgFwidXPH3
iLPUl3CwfrxOz3RFDkNR
=EUGu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]