Re: [orca-list] Aria-hidden: confirmation in newer Orcas?
- From: Peter Vágner <pvdeejay gmail com>
- To: Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes stommepoes nl>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Aria-hidden: confirmation in newer Orcas?
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:05:35 +0100
Hello,
With Firefox 25 and Orca 3.10.2 I can see the following:
test 1 aria hidden: fail
test 2 HTML5 hidden: pass
test 3 CSS display:none: pass
test 4 CSS off screen: fail
test 5 HTML5 hidden aria-hidden=false: pass
test 6 CSS display:none aria-hidden=false: pass
test 7 CSS off left aria-hidden=true: fail
I can see the same behaviour while copying text from Firefox to Gedit
for example so I am afraid this might be difficult if not impossible to
solve in Orca.
I am kinda surprised. I do have some serious issues with navigating in
epiphany documents however with epiphany 3.10.2, webkitgtk 2.2.2 and
orca 3.10.2 all test appear to pass for me. I would be curious if
someone else can verify this.
Greetings
Peter
On 30.11.2013 15:01, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
Hey guys,
The mighty Steve Faulkner has put up a sort of status-update
on aria-hidden HTML properties for us web devs, to show
that browser and AT support is slowly getting better. What he
did not have was Orca or Window-Eyes results.
I'm still running Precise, I still have Orca 3.4.2 and since this
is my work computer where compiz and everything else seems
slightly unstable, I don't dare upgrade Gnome or anything. In
fact, launching Orca always gets me compiz crash alerts.
Anyway I want to ask if someone running a newer Orca, like 3.8.x
could go through Steve's test page and see if you get the same
results as me: aria-hidden doesn't seem to mean anything in Orca
in Firefox 24 (Steve said it was fine that I couldn't test FF 25).
Here's his post: http://blog.paciellogroup.com/2013/11/html5-accessibility-chops-hidden-aria-hidden-support/
Here's the test page, it's pretty easy to go through it:
http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/hidden2013.html
First is a list of AT/browsers he did manage to test, and then a
table showing the results. So the second column shows what you
should get if everything passes.
I got
1. Fail (aria-hidden doesn't hide content from Orca)
2. Pass (HTML 'hidden' attribute hides content)
3. Pass (display: none hides content)
4. Pass (off-screen CSS positioning, still hear content though that
should be *negative* 9999px)
5. Fail (aria-hidden set to false doesn't reveal content to Orca)
6. Fail (same as above)
7. Fail (aria-hidden doesn't hide content from Orca)
5 and 6 are failing in two other screen readers in Firefox 25 while 1
passes so these could be Firefox letting other hiding techniques
override aria-hidden, but if Orca 3.8.x has different results it
could mean something else.
This is just a nice-to-know for developers, otherwise Steve will still
get my results at least and we all know Joanie's doing a big
overhaul of Absolutely Everything so it might also be worthwhile to
worry about testing these a few versions later. But it would be
nice to know where bleeding-edge is right now on this.
Thanks in advance.
cheers,
Mallory
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]