Re: [orca-list] More on desktop shells, 2D vs 3D, and the future.
- From: Frederik Gladhorn <gladhorn kde org>
- To: Alex Midence <alex midence gmail com>
- Cc: orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] More on desktop shells, 2D vs 3D, and the future.
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:51:19 +0200
On Friday 11. May 2012 10.58.15 Alex Midence wrote:
Hi, Frederik,
Do you have a "What needs to be done" page? Something someone who
wants to have a go as you put it can use to make a game plan?
No, I don't have a list. Currently I'd say: just try to use it.
In my opinion the first and not so difficult step would be to make KRunner
accessible (the app launcher that appears when pressing alt-f2).
Then move on to more and more of Plasma, I wrote some basic patch a while ago,
but it's really unfinished.
Cheers
Frederik
alex M
On 5/11/12, Frederik Gladhorn <gladhorn kde org> wrote:
Fredag 11. mai 2012 08.25.33 skrev Alex Midence:
Hi, Frederik,
Out of curiosity, has any progress been made in the area of text entry
fields and text editing widgets with qt? Last I checked a little less
than a month ago, this functionality was not working well. Any idea
how things are going now?
This is one of the things that is hard to fix in Qt 4 and should be much
improved in Qt 5 since I was aware of some flaws in our old API and could
improve the event sending.
I assume it would be possible to improve Qt 4 more, but right now I have
some
other pressing tasks to work on, so this will have to wait. If someone
wants
to have a go, I'm happy to help of course.
Cheers
Frederik
Thanks.
Alex M
On 5/11/12, Frederik Gladhorn <gladhorn kde org> wrote:
Hi Luke,
I'll just quickly comment on the KDE part ;)
Onsdag 9. mai 2012 15.56.26 skrev Luke Yelavich:
Hi all,
KDE:
KDE uses the QT widget toolkit. I believe that KDE does use 3D
rendering
by
default, although this may be incorrect. It also may be possible to
disable
3D graphics rendering, although again I am not 100% sure.
Whilst QT accessibility is improving, more work is needed to improve
KDE's
accessibility, as KDE has many custom elements that need to be enabled
for
accessibility. We will have accessible KDe applications before we have
the
whole desktop accessible, which is still good enough, given our other
desktop shell choices.
KDE has logic to try to use 3D and automatically fall back to not using
it.
The code base is the same, so there is no noticable difference between
the
two. I can toggle the effects by a keyboard shortcut at runtime.
As for custom widgets, my testing shows that surprisingly many just
work.
Some
features will be "invisible" to the screen reader, such as KDE adding a
small
clear button in line edits. But the edit will still works as normal,
just
the
clear button not be discovered.
And yes, there is still a long way to go, let's start today ;)
Cheers
Frederik
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]