Re: [orca-list] OT Orca, Skype and accessibility workaround
- From: Michael Whapples <mwhapples aim com>
- To: Orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] OT Orca, Skype and accessibility workaround
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:06:39 +0000
You raise a couple of points I will comment on.
TeamSpeak, I don't know about TeamTalk which you mention, but TeamSpeak
does have a Linux client, debian has the TeamSpeak client in its
non-free repository. The debian package for teamspeak-client points
users to the home page http://www.goteamspeak.com. The Linux TeamSpeak
client doesn't seem accessible though so isn't an option for those who
rely on orca for access to the computer.
Pidgin may not do voice calls normally, but from what I understand the
skype4pidgin plugin does allow users to use pidgin to make calls via the
skype client (IE. allowing users to make skype calls from within the
pidgin interface). I haven't been able to get this working on my system
though.
From what I know SIP is the best solution for accessible clients
(probably due to SIP being an open standard and many clients having been
written for it). As for the voice quality on SIP, this is something I
haven't gone into too much but people seem to be saying with the right
codecs it can be of a good quality.
Michael Whapples
On 23/12/42 19:59, Erik Heil wrote:
Hi,
OK, maybe I completely missed something. Is Teamspeak/Teamtalk the same
thing? if so, I fail to see why that is mentioned here. As far as I'm
concerned, their are no (nix( clients available for Teamtalk/Teamspeak. So
their fore, its not at all revelant to the discussion. Pidgin? Great. Does
not have voice chat available, but then again, that's not at all
important, as i never actually use it the few times when I actually use
Windows. As far as why Skype is being mentioned, that's simply because of
its popularity. Want a free alternative to Skype that has the same audio
quality? Well, then, perhaps GSM will do the trick. Or then, their's also
Speex. Then again, there's existing H.323/SIP standards which already do
have client-to-client operability.
--Erik
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, hank smith wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:05:42 -0700
From: hank smith<hanksmith5 gmail com>
To: Labrador<labrad0r edpnet be>, Orca-list<orca-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: [orca-list] OT Orca, Skype and accessibility workaround
because skype is widely used with the blind comunity
---
contact info:
twitter
http://www.twitter.com/hanksmith
msn messenger:
hanksmith5 gmail com
skype:
hanksmith5
websites coming soon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Labrador"<labrad0r edpnet be>
To: "Orca-list"<orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [orca-list] OT Orca, Skype and accessibility workaround
Why should skype (a non free thing) be the first to be accessible
while there are lots of free and opensource software under gpl, like
amsn, pidgin, ekiga, teamspeak etc... ?
why should non-free be encouraged while free left unaccessible or
unoptimized ?
Why shouldn't skype users be invited to switch to other better tools? why
does people uses skype with a maximum of person limits, while teamspeak
servers autorize to talk together even if you are about 120 users ? (joke)
Labrad0r
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
eheil sdf lonestar org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]