GNOME.org
 

Re: [orca-list] Gnome on Debian - Latest Version

Hmmmm... How do you update fedora with yum from 9 to 10, etc... it might be consideration if I coudl do that. 

Alonzo

On 02/05/2009 04:29 PM, al Sten-Clanton wrote:

Greetings!  Concerning updating Fedora, I've done it using yum from version
8 to 9 and from 9 to 10.

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: orca-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:orca-list-bounces gnome org] On
Behalf Of Alonzo
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:28 PM
To: Orca E-mail List
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Gnome on Debian - Latest Version

You could also try Arch linux. Its up to date and a rolling release. So you
would update the machine with one command through pacman. You have to do
some configurations so its not for those who want a distro that just works.
Fedora works good as well. there is a way to update the entire system say
for example from fedora10 to fedora11. I'm not sure how well it works though
as I'm currently using arch linux.

Alonzo

On 02/05/2009 10:13 AM, Steve Holmes wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Will,

Can you dual boot open solaris like you can with linux using grub or
lilo?

I think there were issues about sound card compatibility too.  I use a
Creative Labs SB Live card and I thought I heard OpenSolaris didn't
work with that one.
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:58:24AM -0500, Willie Walker wrote:


If it helps, the lead developers of Orca work primarily on
OpenSolaris.  ;-)

Will

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 05:49 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

That's really too bad too.  I gave up on dropline gnome last year
because they lagged so far behind.  I've been a slackware for many
years and generally loved it for its basic simplicity and ease at
getting under the hood so to speak.  So I went and tried Debian.  I
like its package management and dependency tracking and all but this
gnome thing really disappointments me.  You would think that going
unstable would get you the supposed latest versions but alas they
are sitting on what is now an older version of gnome.  I understand
a lot of our accessibility enhancements depend on having the latest
gnome version and Debian package managers who don't like 2.24 are
holding Deb users back in this regard.  I'm not in a mood to do yet
another re-install of linux to switch to Solarus or Ubuntu.  I would
just hope they get a move on with Debian and get gnome up to date.

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:56:30AM -0400, E.J. Zufelt wrote:


Good morning Steve,

I used to have an article written by the debian gnome package
manager eplaining why they haven't included 2.24 in their
repositories, but at the moment I can't find it.

Suffice it to say that although some 2.24 packages are in
experimental, gnome-core is not and may not be for some time.  It
has something to do with the debian-gnome folks not liking some of
the things that gnome 2.24 does with session management.  You could
try building gnome 2.24 yourself, but that seems like an aweful lot
of work that is certainly going to be filled with a great deal of

frustration.

HTH,
Everett


On 5-Feb-09, at 7:39 AM, Steve Holmes wrote:



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

I'm doing that and have Orca-2.24.1, I believe, but the rest of
gnome is still at 2.22.whatever.  That's the part I want to improve.

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:48:43AM -0400, E.J. Zufelt wrote:


Good evening Steve,

I bbelieve that I was using Cid and pulled down Orca from
experimental with no problems.

HTH,
Everett
On 5-Feb-09, at 3:21 AM, Steve Holmes wrote:



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Do any Debian users know if/when any levels of Debian will go to
gnome later than 2.22.X? I just looked in the Packages listing
for unstable and it still shows 2.22.5 or something.  It seems
like Deb is slipping behind the other distros here.  Many other
distros have been using
2.24 for months now.  Just wondering.  I understand going to
2.24 of gnome may clear up some of the accessibility issues I'm
having.  I suppose I could try and pull gnome from experimental?
Any ideas on when Lenny will becom stable? I thought I heard
that when that does that the other stuff can start moving again.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkmKk5IACgkQWSjv55S0LfEbpACg0vOy1tUPAShzqD4WNQrJmP+w
C3QAniOTORIC/oiPEgah3Mfa2wvO/PnV =048X -----END PGP
SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkmKz/cACgkQWSjv55S0LfEJJQCgsfRuuFSC0z8egruijYgoVULX
KoYAoPylGGPnXB2rBBj5Jd7ZxGIFlTud
=N8OH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkmK4GQACgkQWSjv55S0LfGkVwCfZSTc17IbiMkWpSWp50C2nhoz
MH4AoNph8aIRHgF7wqIx11RLPoIYH9t6
=33XV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkmLEDQACgkQWSjv55S0LfEcuwCfTODim9XET4sQjHUx3H6UgdyE
i5EAoLcRzoYBjUObqXcW5kf39NZW8ElG
=eI6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca



_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]