Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?

[Mike Martin <redtuxxx yahoo co uk>]

 --- Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@gnome-db.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-30
at 10:40, Mike Martin wrote:
> >  --- Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org> wrote: > <quote who="James
> > Henstridge">
> > > 
> > > > If a machine has orbit2 headers installed, then it also has
> > > orbit-idl, so
> > > > any arguments about including the generated files for the
> benefit
> > > of
> > > > people without orbit-idl don't really stand up.
> > > > 
> > > > If any source tarballs are including generated stubs, then
> they
> > > should
> > > > definitely be fixed.  The fix is to not include the generated
> > > files,
> > > > rather than to include newer versions of generated files.
> > > 
> > > Great, thanks for that explanation. Marco was right in saying
> that
> > > this
> > > should be documented a bit better, because it seems that *lots*
> of
> > > tarballs
> > > include the generated files (there is a massive amount of
> breakage
> > > in my
> > > current GARNOME tree). Time to report bugs, then. :-)
> > 
> > just for info - are you getting build breakages or runtime havoc
> > 
> > A build on the weekend left pretty much everything unable to run
> > before reverting ORBit (libwnck, gnome-panel, nautilus plus all
> my g2
> > apps such as evo, epi, gnumeric)
> > 
> I'm having runtime problems. gnome-session can't get gnome-panel to
> start. I rebuilt almost everything but no luck. What did you do to
> make
> it work again? Revert to what?
> 
> cheers
> 

ORBit2 from cvs 24_6 (my last build)
__________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list 

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html