Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 10:40, Mike Martin wrote:
>  --- Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org> wrote: > <quote who="James
> Henstridge">
> > 
> > > If a machine has orbit2 headers installed, then it also has
> > orbit-idl, so
> > > any arguments about including the generated files for the benefit
> > of
> > > people without orbit-idl don't really stand up.
> > > 
> > > If any source tarballs are including generated stubs, then they
> > should
> > > definitely be fixed.  The fix is to not include the generated
> > files,
> > > rather than to include newer versions of generated files.
> > 
> > Great, thanks for that explanation. Marco was right in saying that
> > this
> > should be documented a bit better, because it seems that *lots* of
> > tarballs
> > include the generated files (there is a massive amount of breakage
> > in my
> > current GARNOME tree). Time to report bugs, then. :-)
> 
> just for info - are you getting build breakages or runtime havoc
> 
> A build on the weekend left pretty much everything unable to run
> before reverting ORBit (libwnck, gnome-panel, nautilus plus all my g2
> apps such as evo, epi, gnumeric)
> 
I'm having runtime problems. gnome-session can't get gnome-panel to
start. I rebuilt almost everything but no luck. What did you do to make
it work again? Revert to what?

cheers