Re: ORBit2 asyncness ...

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 14:09, dahaverk@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> I have to agree the "async" code will be more usefull.

	Great :-)

> I keep picking away at the compatibility problems between ORBit and MICO.

	Even better,

> Yes I was refering to ORBit.     It seems strange to have an ORBit-mt
> version on Source forge....  Even though ORBit is "frozen" it would seem
> reasonable to merge the ORBit-mt stuff.  Fewer different specializations.

	Frozen, means frozen that we don't go changing the code without a good
reason, like fixing a critical bug. Particularly anything that might
change the ABI / API and/or add instability is not going to happen in
there.

	What should really happen is that the threading support changes should
be merged into the ORBit2 core for the gnome-2.2 development branch (
now HEAD ).

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks@gnu.org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot