Re: [c++] STL extensions?



On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 21:45, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> I know I'll probably get flamed to death from spec nazis for even bringing
> it up, but could we consider API extensions in the C++ IDL compiler so
> that for example, sequences can be handled by STL containers?

I think that this would only be acceptable as a 2nd mapping. e.g.
orbit-idl-2 -lc++gergo

And even then I'd only use it if it was a wrapper of -lc++, so I could
do gergoobj.cppmappingobj().

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]