Re: [[orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?]

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

Michael Meeks <michael@ximian.com> wrote:
> Hi Murray,
> 
> On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 16:05, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > The CORBA_Object definition seems to be private unless
> > ORBIT2_INTERNAL_API is #defined. But the CORBA:Object class uses it as a
> > member variable, trying, I think, to do C-style inheritance from it. I'm
> > not sure whether we should define ORBIT2_INTERNAL_API somewhere or
> > whether we should try to use a CORBA_Object*.
> 
> 	Very strange; hmm, what file is this in in the ORB ? I'd be interested
> to see what is going on; quite possibly we can add some fields for the
> C++ ORB to the basic CORBA_Object record - so we don't need to expose
> it.

Sorry, I'm not very online now or for the next couple of weeks. I'll have to
ask you take a look yourself - it should be quite obvious when building the
tarball that I linked to.

> 
> 	Clearly, exposing it is really nasty if we then want to change the
> record size - which is why it is hidden.
> 
> 	Regards,
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks@gnu.org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> orbitcpp-list mailing list
> orbitcpp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/orbitcpp-list


Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com