Re: Orbit Performance Questions
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: dou wen <orbkernel hotmail com>
- Cc: orbit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Orbit Performance Questions
- Date: 03 Jan 2002 12:37:12 +0000
Hi Wen Dou,
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 18:45, dou wen wrote:
> not at all, my chinese name is dou wen or douwen, in english, it's wen dou :-),both ok.
:-) Grief - I'm lost - either way will Wen Dou do ? :-)
> ok ,at beginning, i intend to divided the whole projects to two parts:
> in-kernel glib and in-kernel Orbit2, so i talked about put whole glib to
> kernel. now , i changed my mind--put it into with minimum needed, as you suggested.
Oh - I see; yes glib is quite a large API to port perhaps.
> ya, i think gnome do not surely need the multithread orb, because most of its
> applications is not for high overload network application,just for desktop component,
> is that right?
Sure - it would be nice to have a multi-threaded ORB in some ways; but
the issue is that on the desktop most programmers cannot cope with the
locking issues - in fact, few of them can cope with the concept of
re-enterancy and spend their lives complaining about this :-) [ and
asking for threading which only adds complexity ].
firstname.lastname@example.org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
] [Thread Prev