Re: OAF memory usage concerns

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com> writes:

> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Richard Andrews wrote:
> 
> > I hope this isn't off topic.
> >
> > I just got Nautilus 3 and associated libs.
> >
> > I noticed after about an hour that the memory usage of oafd was over 50 M
> > (RSS of 11 M). I find it a bit excessive and I'm wondering why it's such a
> > hog and more importantly what the predicted memory usage is for the future.
> 
> 1. That sounds pretty bad.
> 2. This probably belongs on gnome-components-list and not orbit-list, or
> even better in bugzilla.gnome.org for oaf.

I've been told that oaf is bugtracked on bugzilla.eazel.com.

Regards,
                                        Owen