Re: OAF memory usage concerns

[Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>]

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Richard Andrews wrote:

> I hope this isn't off topic.
>
> I just got Nautilus 3 and associated libs.
>
> I noticed after about an hour that the memory usage of oafd was over 50 M
> (RSS of 11 M). I find it a bit excessive and I'm wondering why it's such a
> hog and more importantly what the predicted memory usage is for the future.

1. That sounds pretty bad.
2. This probably belongs on gnome-components-list and not orbit-list, or
even better in bugzilla.gnome.org for oaf.

-- Elliot
Who me? I just wander from room to room.