Re: How to tell NM to ignore some interfaces
- From: Daniel Miranda <danielkza2 gmail com>
- To: Jetchko Jekov <jetchko jekov gmail com>, Thomas Haller <thaller redhat com>, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: How to tell NM to ignore some interfaces
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 12:44:01 -0200
I've written some udev rules to attempt to exclude docker and libvirt
interfaces, but I'm not having great success. The bridges, even if
marked with the NM_UNMANAGED=1 udev attribute are still showing up as
managed. Only one of the libvirt interfaces (not the bridge) is ignored
as expected.
Right after killing docker and removing the docker0 interface:
$ systemctl start docker
$ udevadm info --path=/sys/class/net/docker0
P: /devices/virtual/net/docker0
E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/net/docker0
E: DEVTYPE=bridge
E: ID_MM_CANDIDATE=1
E: ID_NET_DRIVER=bridge
E: ID_NET_LINK_FILE=/usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
E: IFINDEX=9
E: INTERFACE=docker0
E: NM_UNMANAGED=1
E: SUBSYSTEM=net
E: SYSTEMD_ALIAS=/sys/subsystem/net/devices/docker0
E: TAGS=:systemd:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=107064680189
$ nmcli dev status
DEVICE TYPE STATE CONNECTION
docker0 bridge connected docker0
virbr0 bridge connected virbr0
eno1 ethernet unavailable --
lo loopback unmanaged --
virbr0-nic tap unmanaged --
Those are the rules I created as
/etc/udev/rules.d/85-nm-unmanaged-docker-libvirt.rules, based on the
original ones in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-nm-unmanaged.rules:
SUBSYSTEM!="net", GOTO="nm_unmanaged_end"
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="nm_unmanaged_end"
# Determine ID_NET_DRIVER if there's no ID_NET_DRIVER or DRIVERS (old udev?)
ENV{ID_NET_DRIVER}=="?*", GOTO="nm_unmanaged_driver"
DRIVERS=="?*", GOTO="nm_unmanaged_driver"
PROGRAM="/bin/sh -c '/usr/sbin/ethtool -i $1 | /bin/sed -n s/^driver:\
//p' -- $env{INTERFACE}", RESULT=="?*", ENV{ID_NET_DRIVER}="%c"
LABEL="nm_unmanaged_driver"
ENV{INTERFACE}=="docker*", ENV{NM_UNMANAGED}="1"
ENV{INTERFACE}=="virbr*", ENV{NM_UNMANAGED}="1"
LABEL="nm_unmanaged_end"
Is it a bug in NM, where it manages bridges regardless of the exclusion
attribute?
Regards,
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]