Re: Re:

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 15:55 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 03:22 PM, David Castellanos wrote:
> > > Would love to see those logs, wherever they are :)
> >
> > OMG, I'm sure I had attached the log file (also I thought I had
> > written the email subject too) :-S
> >
> > Hopefully this time arrives the attachment.
>
> So, yeah, seen this already I think:
>
> May 16 10:42:21 localhost ModemManager[20771]: <debug>
> [1368693741.528368] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:762]
> load_initial_sms_parts_ready(): Couldn't load SMS parts from storage
> 'sm': 'Couldn't list messages: QMI protocol error (17): 'MissingArgument''

I've seen that on the ADU-960s with 2010-era QMI:

revision: 'M9600B-SCAQDAFD-1.0.32T  1  [Aug 17 2010 02:00:00]'

ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1] QMI Device supports 8 services:
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    ctl (1.4)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    wds (1.9)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    dms (1.3)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    nas (1.2)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    qos (1.2)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    wms (1.2)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    pds (1.3)
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1]    uim (1.4)

ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720595.009652] [mm-broadband-modem-qmi.c:5847] messaging_check_support(): 
Messaging capabilities supported by this modem
ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720595.009808] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:1113] 
load_supported_storages_ready(): Supported storages loaded:
ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720595.009868] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:1114] 
load_supported_storages_ready():   mem1 (list/read/delete) storages: 'sm, me'
ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720595.009934] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:1115] 
load_supported_storages_ready():   mem2 (write/send) storages:       'sm, me'
ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720595.009996] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:1116] 
load_supported_storages_ready():   mem3 (reception) storages:        'sm, me'

ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1] Sent message (translated)...
<<<<<< QMUX:
<<<<<<   length  = 20
<<<<<<   flags   = 0x00
<<<<<<   service = "wms"
<<<<<<   client  = 1
<<<<<< QMI:
<<<<<<   flags       = "none"
<<<<<<   transaction = 2
<<<<<<   tlv_length  = 8
<<<<<<   message     = "List Messages" (0x0031)
<<<<<< TLV:
<<<<<<   type       = "Message Mode" (0x12)
<<<<<<   length     = 1
<<<<<<   value      = 01
<<<<<<   translated = gsm-wcdma
<<<<<< TLV:
<<<<<<   type       = "Storage Type" (0x01)
<<<<<<   length     = 1
<<<<<<   value      = 00
<<<<<<   translated = uim
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1] Received message...
> > > > > > RAW:
> > > > > >   length = 20
> > > > > >   data   = 01:13:00:80:05:01:02:02:00:31:00:07:00:02:04:00:01:00:11:00
ModemManager[9163]: [/dev/cdc-wdm1] Received message (translated)...
> > > > > > QMUX:
> > > > > >   length  = 19
> > > > > >   flags   = 0x80
> > > > > >   service = "wms"
> > > > > >   client  = 1
> > > > > > QMI:
> > > > > >   flags       = "response"
> > > > > >   transaction = 2
> > > > > >   tlv_length  = 7
> > > > > >   message     = "List Messages" (0x0031)
> > > > > > TLV:
> > > > > >   type       = "Result" (0x02)
> > > > > >   length     = 4
> > > > > >   value      = 01:00:11:00
> > > > > >   translated = FAILURE: MissingArgument
ModemManager[9163]: <debug> [1368720630.557661] [mm-iface-modem-messaging.c:762] 
load_initial_sms_parts_ready(): Couldn't load SMS parts from storage 'sm': 'Couldn't list messages: QMI 
protocol error (17): 'MissingArgument''

The error happens for all storages.

What's bizarre is that a Gobi 1k with really, *really* old QMI (2009)
works just fine with the exact same command sequence.  So it can't
really be related to old vs. new QMI version, just that some devices
with some versions of WMS perhaps want a specific TLV?

Dan

> May 16 10:42:38 localhost ModemManager[20771]: <debug>
> [1368693758.146427] [mm-broadband-modem-qmi.c:6258]
> wms_indication_raw_read_ready(): Couldn't read raw message: QMI protocol
> error (17): 'MissingArgument'
>
> Will take a look at it.