Re: NetworkManager git20121211

[Gene Czarcinski <gene czarc net>]

On 01/31/2013 10:59 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> I needed some functionality (dynamic dns update) not available in the 
> NetworkManager package available in Fedora 18 so I created my own 
> version based on git20121130.  This worked nicely providing the 
> functionality and did not appear to have any bad side effects.
>
> Then the NetworkManager git20121211 package appeared in rawhide it is 
> usually better to use a package available from Fedora.  So, I got the 
> source rpm and rebuilt it for Fedora 18.
>
> This appeared to work fine until I realized that all of the virtual 
> networks did not have the expected IPv4 addresses. Surprisingly, if 
> IPv6 was defined for a network, it was there.
>
> After some investigation, I could only see that NetworkManager may be 
> the problem.  I downgraded to the git20121130 package and rebooted.  
> The virtual networks were now OK.
>
> Any suggestions on how to report this problem? (against what and what 
> release?)
>
> I am effectively cross-posting by sending identical messages to the 
> NetworkManager and libvirt mailing lists.  Yes, I believe the problem 
> is with NetworkManager but there is a large libvirt impact.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905035