Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed

From: Michael Stapelberg <michael+nm stapelberg de>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:01:59 +0100

Hi Dan,

Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> writes:

cat /var/run/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.conf
server=192.168.1.1
server=fe80::4e60:deff:fed8:d7c5 eth0
server=192.168.1.1
server=fe80::4e60:deff:fed8:d7c5 wlan0

I suppose it doesnât really hurt, at least not in my case, but wouldnât
it be cleaner if entry was only listed once? :-)


Yeah, probably.  I assume it would be sufficient to just not list the
IPv4 nameserver twice?

Correct. Anything else is actually wrong â the âsameâ IPv6 link-local
address with different interface identifiers HAS to be treated as a
different address.

-- 
Best regards,
Michael

References:
- [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Michael Stapelberg
- Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Dan Williams
- Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Michael Stapelberg
- Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Dan Williams
- Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Michael Stapelberg
- Re: [PATCH] dns: store priv->last_iface even when no actual updates are performed
  - From: Dan Williams

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]