Re: NM bug 684242 and other stuff
- From: Pavel Simerda <psimerda redhat com>
- To: Gene Czarcinski <gene czarc net>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: NM bug 684242 and other stuff
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:33 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Czarcinski" <gene czarc net>
> To: networkmanager-list gnome org
> Cc: "Pavel Simerda" <psimerda redhat com>
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:09:18 PM
> Subject: Re: NM bug 684242 and other stuff
>
> On 09/26/2012 04:51 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> > The proper keyfile configuration is for example:
> >
> > [connection]
> > id=Ethernet
> > uuid=d880f3bb-8c51-4ca4-aef7-1954e022820f
> > type=802-3-ethernet
> > [802-3-ethernet]
> > mac-address=52:54:00:eb:e9:fb
> > [ipv4]
> > method=auto
> > [ipv6]
> > nmmethod=auto
> I believe you have a type for ipv6. For ipv6, it should be the same
> as for ipv4: method=auto
It is, nmmethod is a mistake.
> Or at least this is what i got when it worked correctly: ipvr dhcp
> address and dns update plus RA for default route ... same as for
> ifcfg-rh.
Good.
> One thing I have learned while "playing around". To make sure
> things > are working correctly: On the client, stop NetworkManager, delete the
> keyfile and lease files. On the server, stop named, dhcpd, and
> dhcpd6; then delete the dhcpd lease info files, and restart everything.
Yep, clean state. This way I was testing this bug, for example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662254
Without that you can be never sure that you don't have false positives from previous
leases.
> Now, back to the client, start NetworkManager and then enable the network
> device (usually Auto Ethernet).
I usually just let the Ethernet autoconnect. But I usually flush global addresses
before starting NM. It still gets easily confused by the current state of the networks
but this is being worked on.
> When I did not clean up everything and start fresh on both sides, I
> got unpredictable results.
You're right. I've already created scripts for clean testing for myself, at least for
the client side.
Cheers,
Pavel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]