Re: [PATCH] Fix for Blueman modem being ignored

On 23/10/12 12:15, Nick Peskett wrote:
> If this is the case could memcmp(ip_iface, "rfcomm", 6) also be added to
> the condition? This might allow generic unclaimed bluetooth modems to
> still work.

That memcmp() is quite equivalent to just comparing the driver with
"bluetooth" as we did before.


What could happen if we end up allowing bluetooth-based modems not being
grabbed by the NMDeviceBt and therefore created as plain NMDeviceModem
objects? As far as I can see, the bluetooth DUN settings required for
the modem to connect don't really have any bluetooth-specific stuff in
there, not sure why plain gsm/cdma modem settings aren't enough.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]