Re: prefix=48 static route

[Pavel Simerda <psimerda redhat com>]

Static route should work, but the syntax is different from IPv4. I'm working on
getting it work the same (see 'pavlix/keyfile' branch). I don't currently know
how this works with ifcfg-rh.

Pavel

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Czarcinski" <gene czarc net>
> To: networkmanager-list gnome org
> Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:30:28 PM
> Subject: prefix=48 static route
> 
> Should I be able to specify an IPv6 prefix=48 static route and have
> it work?
> 
> I tried but it was with a lot of other "testing" and things may have
> just gotten a bit screwed up.
> 
> So many things about IPv6 seem to want only prefix=64.
> 
> Gene
> _______________________________________________
> networkmanager-list mailing list
> networkmanager-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>