Re: Huawei fixes in '06-huawei' branch

On 26/10/12 14:08, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> So in this case we also don't have a port reported as 'MDM', but still
> we have the NDIS port reported, and actually SETPORT says that NDIS is
> enabled, which seems to be wrong. So, probably we cannot rely on that
> reply and we should consider that if NDIS reported and no MDM reported,
> always take the one reported as NDIS as data port... what do you think?

There's a new '06-huawei-simple' branch upstream which has a patch to
try to fix the issue with the logic above.

Can anyone who can reproduce the issue test it?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]