Re: IPv6 default routes / NM vs. kernel autoconfig

> >
> > Default gateway selection is
> > another.
> Do you intend multiple, simultaneous equal-cost gateways to be a
> use-case here? Because that's a valid, often desirable use-case.

I'm answering for myself. Currently not. We have other priorities
but it may be reconsidered in the future.

> The whole area is complex, and interacts with RFC3484(bis)
> destination
> address selection, in particular rule 5.5 of 3484bis.

We are in clash with some of the RFCs and some of them are even wrong. I'm
dedicating *some* time working for improvement on both implementation and
specification sides. Help appreciated.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]