Re: IPv6 default routes / NM vs. kernel autoconfig

[Phil Mayers <p mayers imperial ac uk>]

On 31/07/12 12:12, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 31/07/12 12:06, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> > Default gateway selection is
> > another.
>
> Do you intend multiple, simultaneous equal-cost gateways to be a
> use-case here? Because that's a valid, often desirable use-case.
>
> The whole area is complex, and interacts with RFC3484(bis) destination
> address selection, in particular rule 5.5 of 3484bis.
>
> Interested to hear your thoughts on this use-case.

Sorry - lot of "use-case" in that email ;o)