Re: Alcatel x060s - incorrect port
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
 
- To: Andrey Alakozov <aa29ww gmail com>
 
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
 
- Subject: Re: Alcatel x060s - incorrect port
 
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:22:47 -0700
 
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:53 +0400, Andrey Alakozov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In udevadm DB, ttyUSB1 has ID_MM_LONGCHEER_PORT_TYPE_AUX=1 flag, and
> ttyUSB2 has ID_MM_LONGCHEER_PORT_TYPE_MODEM=1 flag.
> 
> I've changed ATTRS{idProduct}=="0000", ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="03"
> 
> in 77-mm-longcheer-port-types.rules to be both aux and modem
> and it worked! Now NM could connect OK.
Is there any chance I can get the Windows .INF files from you off the
device's fake driver CD?  In a pinch, feel free to just mail me the
entire contents of the fake driver CD or post it somewhere I can grab
it.  This will clear up the issue 100%.
I have the driver for the X020s, but not the X060s.
> While playing with it I found that NM fails to find modem if Ethernet 
> connection is active:
> 
> # tail -f /var/log/syslog
> 
> ...
> Apr 29 13:18:07 andrey-laptop NetworkManager: Could not get modem 
> driver: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote 
> application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy 
> blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection 
> was broken.
Quite interesting; that indicates a problem with ModemManager.  Any
chance you can grab some modem-manager debugging for me?
http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/Debugging
under the "Debugging NetworkManager 0.8.x 3G connections" section.  And
lets see what's going on there.
> If I detach Ethernet before plugging modem in everything works fine.
> It's a minor issue for me because I do not intend to use Ethernet and 3G 
> connections simultaneously.
That's certainly a bug.  Can you grab some of NM's syslog output for me?
See the "Log locations" on the Debugging link I pasted above and lets
see what NM's doing.
> See udevadm output below.
Ok, the output looks good and we've confirmed the rules are applied.
Apparently they are just wrong :)
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]