Re: Headless version for routers...

[Marc Herbert <Marc Herbert gmail com>]

Ed W wrote :

> Does anyone see any plans to tease the 
> frontend and backend completely apart (perhaps with only a dbus 
> communication channel between them)?  The idea being that you end up 
> with a headless management daemon and a control application (perhaps one 
> of several)?

Sorry but... isn't that already the case? I am currently using version
0.7.1. Once I have configured some system connections, the headless NM
daemon stays perfectly alive and kicking even after shutting down X.