Re: org.freedesktop.ModemManager.Modem.Gsm.Network.NetworkMode signal
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Tambet Ingo <tambet gmail com>
- Cc: network manager <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: org.freedesktop.ModemManager.Modem.Gsm.Network.NetworkMode signal
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:30:03 -0400
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:55 +0300, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Martí <pmarti warp es> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Tambet Ingo <tambet gmail com> wrote:
> >> No, but the argument type passed with the signal is not an integer,
> >> it's NM_MODEM_GSM_NETWORK_MODE. That is, the same type that is used
> >> for setting the network mode. And thus, that type needs all these
> >> values. There is also no need to add another type which is just like
> >> NETWORK_MODE, but doesn't include some of it's values.
> >
> > Oh yeah true. How about adding NO_SIGNAL, HSUPA and HSPA too?
>
> Dan already notified me that I'm missing HSPA. He also said we don't
> need HSUPA for some reason (I don't remember why, Dan?).
Because there is no case where a modem supports HSUPA but not HSDPA, and
thus HSUPA and HSPA are essentially equal. Since HSPA _is_ HSDPA +
HSUPA, it's pointless to have a separate HSUPA.
Dan
> In which case would you need to send a "NetworkMode" changed signal
> with NO_SIGNAL argument? I must be misunderstanding something as I'd
> just not emit the signal in that case?
>
> Tambet
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]