Re: Support for L2TP/IPsec
- From: David Smith <dds google com>
- To: Vincent Bernat <bernat luffy cx>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Support for L2TP/IPsec
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 20:19:50 +0900
Vincent Bernat <bernat luffy cx> writes:
> OoO En cette aube naissante du dimanche 25 mai 2008, vers 07:10, David
> Smith <dds google com> disait:
>> Vincent, in your setup is there a strong reason you are using openswan
>> instead of strongswan? Please share.
> Hi David!
> I have not tried StrongSWAN, so I have no reason to use OpenSWAN instead
> of StrongSWAN.
OK, could you please double-check that your configuration works with
strongswan as well as openswan? I want to propose that we focus on one
IKE implementation and considering the features available in strongswan,
that it works with the most server implementations especially Windows
2003 and 2008 Server and that it supports smartcards the best make it a
lead contender. Dan, what do you think of deciding on an IKE? Something
like a bake-off?
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
] [Thread Prev