ma, 2008-06-02 kello 13:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera kirjoitti:
> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:12 +0300, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> >
<snip>
> >
> > <provider>
> > <name>Service Provider - CDMA</name>
> > <cdma />
> > </provider>
> > <provider>
> > <name>Service Provider - GSM</name>
> > <gsm>
> > <apn>internet</apn>
> > </gsm>
> > </provider>
> > <provider>
> > <name>Service Provider - GSM prepaid</name>
> > <gsm>
> > <apn>prepaid.provider</apn>
> > </gsm>
> > </provider>
>
> I'd rather have:
> <provider type="gsm">
> <name>Service Provider - GSM prepaid</name>
> <apn>prepaid.provider</apn>
> </provider>
I see your point and this was my first idea also. But the problem with
this approach is that I can't validate this with a DTD. At least I
didn't find any way to state:
'if provider element has property "type" set as "gsm" the element must
contain child element "apn" '
But I can state:
'provider must have either "gsm", "cdma" or "phs" child element'
-- Antti
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digitaalisesti allekirjoitettu viestin osa