One more question about device activation (trunk)
- From: Helmut Schaa <hschaa suse de>
- To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>, Tambet Ingo <tambet gmail com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: One more question about device activation (trunk)
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:54:41 +0200
Hi,
just stumbled across an issue while playing around with wireless connections
in KNM.
Why does NM require specific_object to be set when connecting to a wireless
network? Shouldn't the wireless and security settings suffice? What if I want
to connect to a hidden network where no AP is available yet?
In my opinion NM should (if no AP is specified) try to find one in its AP-list
which fits best the connection's settings and use this one (for hidden
networks of course no AP should be used). I think there was some code in NM
which had this behaviour before?
Thanks,
Helmut
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]