Re: nm-openswan is alive again!

["Darren Albers" <dalbers gmail com>]

Tomas, that is an Ubuntu specific issue.




On 6/11/07, Tomáš Hnyk <tomashnyk gmail com> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:46:15 +0200, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:03 -0400, steve wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just a quick post to inform anyone who cares, that I've finished my
> >> employment transition, re-created my development environment and I've
> >> re-started work on the openswan vpn plugin.
> >>
> >> I've made two design changes to allow for multiple concurrent vpn
> >> connections (in future releases) as it will be required for my new job.
> >> I'll post again when I've got a tar ball for others to test.
> >
> > Awesome!  You might want to look at an email recently sent about a new
> > API for VPNs to see if it would also work for openswan.
> >
> > "Proposal for a new VPN DBUS interface" - May 8th
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >> If anyone feels inclined to help with the effort (which is mainly bug
> >> fixing at this point), feel free to contact me.
> >>
> >> Steve.
> Does this also mean that it will possible to use VPN even if the network
> connection is not managed through NM but is set to static as described
> here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/115750 - or
> is that only Ubuntu thing?
> Tomas
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list