Re: Proposed ad-hoc channel bug patch
- From: "Ohad Lutzky" <ohad lutzky net>
- To: "Dan Williams" <dcbw redhat com>
- Cc: gabik <gabik cs technion ac il>, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposed ad-hoc channel bug patch
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:02:59 +0200
Thank you dan! We will probably be testing those this week as well.
On Dec 27, 2007 10:16 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:22 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
>
> > On Dec 25, 2007 4:03 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:29 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> > > > Hi Dan,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the info. A few questions -
> > > >
> > > > * Is there any chance indeed that the feature will be backported into
> > > > wpa_supplicant 0.5.x? Or is it a big restructuring of wpa_sup which
> > > > will make this very difficult?
> > >
> > > No, it's pretty easy and fairly contained. It's just the config option
> > > and the driver hooks for setting the frequency.
> > >
> > > > * Which version of NM uses wpa_supplicant 0.6.x, with the new feature?
> > > > Is a GUI for setting the channel present? Is any sort of channel set
> > > > for ad-hoc mode?
> > >
> > > No version of NM requires 0.6.x. All the D-Bus interface work has been
> > > done on wpa_supplicant 0.5.7 and later but the changes also get applied
> > > to the 0.6.x branch.
> > >
> > > NM does not yet honor the channel setting for either adhoc or
> > > infrastructure mode because the backend wpa_supplicant support is not
> > > yet there.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand... is the wpa_supplicant support for channel
> > setting there in 0.6.x or not? When can we expect NM to use this
> > support?
> >
> > I'm trying to use NM from my application which uses ad-hoc networking
> > heavily (a port of a Windows application, specifically), and current
> > behavior is completely broken for all of the cards I have. Would it be
> > acceptable to use this patch downstream (Debian, Ubuntu) for the time
> > being?
>
> Assuming you have the patch I previously sent applied to your
> wpa_supplicant, NetworkManager and the NM gnome applet from SVN now
> support creating Ad-Hoc networks. I haven't tested WEP or WPA security
> yet but it works so far to create an open Ad-Hoc network with an ipw2200
> card.
>
> Dan
>
>
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > > Much thanks,
> > > > Ohad.
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 25, 2007 12:57 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 10:55 +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently it's not a WPA issue after all. Please check patch attached here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/112009/comments/12
> > > > >
> > > > > Contrary to the bug report, it's _totally_ a wpa_supplicant issue.
> > > > > wpa_supplicant 0.6.x has the required config option, it needs to be
> > > > > backported to wpa_supplicant 0.5.x. NM should _not_ be setting any
> > > > > wireless attributes like channel, BSSID, or SSID itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the patch is wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only
animal that is struck with the difference between what things are and
what they ought to be.
- William Hazlitt
Ohad Lutzky
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]