Re: rt73 driver trouble
- From: Lamarque Vieira Souza <lamarque syst com br>
- To: Jouni Malinen <j w1 fi>, rt2400-devel lists sourceforge net
- Cc: hostap shmoo com, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: rt73 driver trouble
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 07:58:32 -0300
Em Ter 03 Abr 2007, Jouni Malinen escreveu:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:35:50PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 15:52 -0300, Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
> > > I managed to make NetworkManager to work with rt73 driver. The two
> > > patches I used are attached. The wpa_supplicant-0.4.8-ralink.diff
> > > patch is just a patch form of the files supplied by Ralink in
> > > directory RT73_Linux_STA_Drv1.0.3.6/WPA_Supplicant.
> >
> > Custom wpa_supplicant drivers are not the answer. The answer is to fix
> > the driver to work correctly with the WEXT driver. That's why
> > NetworkManager _only_ uses the WEXT driver with wpa_supplicant, because
> > there needs to be standardization on _one_ interface so that we don't
> > need to re-write stuff 50 times for each driver.
I have my means to contact with Ralink's engineers, I can try to convince
them to use WEXT instead. I do not garantee anything tough.
> While I agree with the part that drivers should really use WEXT, my
> policy on driver specific interface implementations for wpa_supplicant
> is quite a bit more open than the one for NM. However..
>
> > > Do you think the wpa_supplicant-0.4.8-ralink.diff can be applied to
> > > main wpa_supplicant? There is not indication of which license the
> > > code in RT73_Linux_STA_Drv1.0.3.6/WPA_Supplicant uses, the code in
> > > RT73_Linux_STA_Drv1.0.3.6/Module is GPL.
>
> This is an issue. I will not apply any random patch from a vendor that
> someone else sends to me, especially so, if there is no clear license
> statement or the change is licensed only under GPL. In other words, if
> someone really wants to get this patch into wpa_supplicant, that someone
> will need to talk with the copyright holder and confirm that this patch
> is available under a compatible (both GPLv2 and BSD) license. In many
> cases, it may be easier to just get the driver converted to support
> WE-18 for WPA configuration..
Ok, I can convince them to release a new tar ball explicity stating the code
is GPL, I think it will be easy to convice them since the module is already
GPLv2. By the way, I used Suse 10.1 for my tests, the NetworkManager and
NetworkManager-kde from Suse 10.2 do not need that hack for the fallback
parameter, so the change for NetworkManager comes down to only use ralink
driver with wpa_supplicant, which works for both WEP and WPA connections.
I am not subscribed to any mailing list, please send e-mail directly to me if
you want to contact me.
--
Lamarque Vieira Souza
Senior Architect and Developer - Metasys
http://www.metasys.com.br
Tel.: +55 31 3296-9040 - Ramal 244
International Syst S/A
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]