Re: vpnc and determining correct routes



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Dan Williams schrieb:
> Well, if you don't run a local caching nameserver, then you will never
> get split DNS.  That's just the way it is, because the glibc folks don't
> want to complicated the core resolver with the split DNS stuff.
I for myself don't need one. It was just a general consideration what
would be if there are two different DNS in two different networks that
don't know about the hosts in the other network.
As I don't need it, I would not be eager to have a bind running on my
box, if it can be avoided.

Regards,
Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFPPaHxVmZpTAq4IgRAhfcAJ4nMtRQWgcNizYwOLSjMlFKtgoDpwCfRg7F
Vn8bmvWupeIbFbeUBUKwkdc=
=5eOL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]