Re: vpnc and determining correct routes
- From: Thomas Liebetraut <thomas tommie-lie de>
- To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: vpnc and determining correct routes
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:06:15 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dan Williams schrieb:
> Well, if you don't run a local caching nameserver, then you will never
> get split DNS. That's just the way it is, because the glibc folks don't
> want to complicated the core resolver with the split DNS stuff.
I for myself don't need one. It was just a general consideration what
would be if there are two different DNS in two different networks that
don't know about the hosts in the other network.
As I don't need it, I would not be eager to have a bind running on my
box, if it can be avoided.
Regards,
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFPPaHxVmZpTAq4IgRAhfcAJ4nMtRQWgcNizYwOLSjMlFKtgoDpwCfRg7F
Vn8bmvWupeIbFbeUBUKwkdc=
=5eOL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]