Re: Wireless silently disconnects?



* Robert Love <rml novell com> [2006-03-01 19:54]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 19:31 -0500, Brian Magnuson wrote:
> 
> > 
> > --- src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c	2006-02-21 11:39:33.000000000 +0100
> > +++ src/nm-device-802-11-wireless.c	2006-03-01 19:06:34.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1808,8 +1808,10 @@
> >  			/* Must be in infrastructure mode during scan, otherwise we don't get a full
> >  			 * list of scan results.  Scanning doesn't work well in Ad-Hoc mode :( 
> >  			 */
> > -			nm_device_802_11_wireless_set_mode (self, IW_MODE_INFRA);
> > -			nm_device_802_11_wireless_set_frequency (self, 0);
> > +			if (nm_device_802_11_wireless_get_mode (self) == IW_MODE_ADHOC) {
> > +				nm_device_802_11_wireless_set_mode (self, IW_MODE_INFRA);
> > +				nm_device_802_11_wireless_set_frequency (self, 0);
> > +			}
> 
> Has anyone tested without this chunk, and with just the second hunk that
> sets the wpa_supplicant driver?
> 
> 	Robert Love

No, but it seemed pretty uncontroversial.  Could be less so by switching that
check to != IW_MODE_INFRA.  I agree though that it's not obvious why this
would be needed at all.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]