Re: WPA status 2006-01-08

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:31 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:16 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> > Seems to be.  SIOCSIWAUTH not being supported shuts the whole process
> > down.  This is an Atheros.
> Alright, got it working.  Nice!
> I still see a boatload of SIOCSIWAUTH "Operation not supported" errors.
> But, whatever.
> Is 0.4.7 + your patch sufficient for WPA?  Or do we need something even
> newer?

I think 0.4.7 is OK, I'm using HEAD but looking at the changelog there's
not much that should affect functionality since before Christmas at
least.  I think at the very least we should make sure 0.4.7 works
correctly for us, and patch it if we need to.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]