Re: WPA status 2006-01-08
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Robert Love <rml novell com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: WPA status 2006-01-08
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:11:53 -0500
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 10:55 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 16:48 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > *) Your driver probably doesn't support WPA quite enough; you'll need a
> > driver that does WEXT-18 or higher. This means that it needs to set the
> > enc_capa bits on return from the SIOCGIWRANGE call, which only hostap
> > seems to do right now.
>
> So ... should we need these updates to use WPA, or for the driver to
> work at all?
Just to use WPA. All cards should support WEP already since you don't
need fancy calls to do that... Unless wpa_supplicant is trying to be
clever.
In the case of ipw2100, NM checks the range->enc_capa field for WPA
support bits, but WEP isn't determined from there. If there are
problems with wpa_supplicant and WEP, then we definitely need to chase
those down.
Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]