Re: Activation Too Long?
- From: Ryan Skadberg <skadz1 gmail com>
- To: Robert Love <rml novell com>
- Cc: rml ximian com, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Activation Too Long?
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:16:43 -0500
I just tested dbus and it seems to work just fine for controlling
rhythmbox. As I said, I am seeing this as root running NetworkManager
--no-daemon, not as my user, so not sure if maybe there is an issue
with the system wide bus?
Skadz
On 2/3/06, Ryan Skadberg <skadz1 gmail com> wrote:
> So, I tried compiling CVS today and am getting the same exact error.
> I've attached a log file that I hope will help someone figure this
> out.
>
> Is there any way I can turn some sort of debugging on to see the dbus sends?
>
> Skadz
>
> On 2/2/06, Robert Love <rml novell com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 19:39 -0500, Ryan Skadberg wrote:
> > > [skadz codewarrior ~]$ rpm -qa | grep NetworkMana
> > > NetworkManager-gnome-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> > > NetworkManager-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> > > NetworkManager-glib-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> > > NetworkManager-devel-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> > > NetworkManager-glib-devel-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> > >
> > > Looks to all be the same. Maybe Dan caught it in the middle of the update?
> >
> > I doubt it -- I don't trust CVS, and it is not atomic, but I did not it
> > as a single commit, and Dan is a fastidious packager and tester of the
> > highest caliber.
> >
> > Oh, 20060131? Predates my changes. False alarm.
> >
> > Nothing should have changed in that API in a long time (before my
> > changes today). Not sure what you are seeing.
> >
> > DBUS behaving, otherwise?
> >
> > Dan, ideas?
> >
> > Robert Love
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]