Re: Activation Too Long?

[Ryan Skadberg <skadz1 gmail com>]

OK, increasing the activation did not help.  So, I started doing a
bunch of debugging and then I saw this:

NetworkManager: <WARNING>        nm_dbus_get_network_data_cb ():
nm_dbus_get_network_data_cb(): dbus returned an error.
  (org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerInfo.InvalidArguments)
nmi_dbus_get_network_properties called with invalid arguments.

This is with a fully updated Rawhide system.  Ideas?

Skadz

On 1/31/06, Ryan Skadberg <skadz1 gmail com> wrote:
> In my case, I have an OLD Linksys (gotta be like 3 years old now) and
> this is with WEP.  Haven't tried WPA yet, since I haven't even gotten
> what was working going again.
>
> I do have to say though, ifup eth1 seems MUCH faster than
> NetworkManager (even with the 0.4.X version of NM).
>
> Skadz
>
> On 1/31/06, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:28 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:19 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 08:41 -0500, Ryan Skadberg wrote:
> > > > > I see in the ChangeLog that this got updated to 20 seconds, Dan, any
> > > > > chance you can generate a new rawhide package?
> > > >
> > > > Sure, I'll try to do that today.
> > >
> > > Can folks with an ipw2100 and ipw2200 try out current CVS and see if 20s
> > > is sufficient for WPA authentication?
> > >
> > > Those are the cards that take forever.
> >
> > Oddly enough my ipw2100 takes the normal amount of time to a Linksys
> > WRT54G with WPA+TKIP...  Does it just take a while with AES or
> > something?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
>