Re: Activation Too Long?
- From: Robert Love <rml novell com>
- To: Ryan Skadberg <skadz1 gmail com>
- Cc: rml ximian com, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Activation Too Long?
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:51:59 -0500
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 19:39 -0500, Ryan Skadberg wrote:
> [skadz codewarrior ~]$ rpm -qa | grep NetworkMana
> NetworkManager-gnome-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> NetworkManager-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> NetworkManager-glib-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> NetworkManager-devel-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
> NetworkManager-glib-devel-0.5.1-8.cvs20060131
>
> Looks to all be the same. Maybe Dan caught it in the middle of the update?
I doubt it -- I don't trust CVS, and it is not atomic, but I did not it
as a single commit, and Dan is a fastidious packager and tester of the
highest caliber.
Oh, 20060131? Predates my changes. False alarm.
Nothing should have changed in that API in a long time (before my
changes today). Not sure what you are seeing.
DBUS behaving, otherwise?
Dan, ideas?
Robert Love
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]